because acknowledging that the native american population has been beaten down by the state repeatedly and for centuries isn't anti-indigenous? because acknowledging that the native american population is a victim of systemic and at times systematic racism isn't anti-indigenous?
unless you would deny that they've been beaten down by the state repeatedly and for centuries?
super weird that the abused aren't in a position of power, and that the abusers are
yeah, the party in power is majority white, and yeah that's because of historic racism, but that doesn't change the scenario that we're both looking at
what's your plan for returning power to indigenous people without involving a group that's currently in power (and therefore predominantly white, since racism exists)?