this is irrelevant though, the context is the survival of the human race and it's foreseeable future, not the theoretical animals that could emerge from the post-nuclear ashes millions of years in the future
why though? I don't care if humans survive, the same way I don't care if certain insect species or redwood trees or giraffes survive. mass extinctions are one of the long cycles that exist in this planet. whatever happens was meant to be.
What the fuck are you doing on a communist board if you're just going to say "it was meant to be" to any possible future? That sort of nihilistic quasi-spiritual bullshit was dumb when Leibniz did it, and it has aged very poorly in the interceding centuries.
"honey, did you set fire to our entire house with everything we owned still in it? and the two of us and our families still in it?"
"pfft, the tunguska event caused much more destruction. stop thinking one person can effect the world that much. and this whole thing is just nature rebuilding iself, do you think we're not part of nature? anyway how much longer did you expect us to live? fifty more years? nothing remains forever. hey, let me tell you about the heat death of the universe..."
I don't care if humans survive, the same way I don't care if certain insect species or redwood trees or giraffes survive. mass extinctions are one of the long cycles that exist in this planet. whatever happens was meant to be.