Justice Clarence Thomas argued that OSHA's authority was unconstitutional. He dissented from the court's decision to reject a challenge to the agency.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has set his sights on eliminating the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced which cases it would consider next and which it wouldn't. Among those the court rejected was a case that challenged the authority of OSHA, which sets and enforces standards for health and safety in the workplace.
And Thomas, widely considered to be the most conservative justice on the already mostly conservative court, wasn't happy.
In a dissent, he explained why he believed the high court should've taken the case: OSHA's power, he argues, is unconstitutional.
"The agency claims authority to regulate
everything from a power lawnmower's
design," he wrote, "to the level of 'contact
between trainers and whales at
SeaWorld.'"
I fail to see anything wrong with either thing like.. is he just mad it is not the people who sell lawn mowers should decide what's safe??
Please please please don't tell me Americans are going to dip to this new level of cognitive dissonance