You're viewing a single thread.
Also, the imperial system is defined through the metric system.
In using imperial, you're just using metric with extra steps.
55 1 ReplyNo Python without C
25 0 Reply18 0 Replynightmare nightmare nightmare
9 0 ReplyBut no GIL if I'm not mistaken. Which means you can get some multi threaded tasks to run much faster without jumping through hoops.
4 0 Reply
Sounds like someone made a trip to the Levi’s store
7 0 ReplyHey look it's Trowser!
1 0 Reply
My goto phrase when I want to troll people: "The creators of python called it that because they wanted a name that started with P, as a nod to its predecessor, Perl."
It's not exactly Ken M level, but post that anywhere and the amount of angry futile typing can faintly be heard around the world as other geeks start fuming.
9 0 ReplyI could feel a disturbance in the force 2 hours ago. Now I know it was precisely when you wrote this comment.
My goto troll-nods are all “subtle” which always makes me laugh harder and my trollees groan louder.
3 0 ReplyWhat a stupid reason to get angry.
Especially as everything needs to be rewritten in Rust anyways
1 0 Reply
Everything is just C with extra steps.
6 0 ReplyWhich is just assembly with extra steps.
2 0 ReplyOr is it the other way around??
3 0 Reply
The Imperial system is not defined though the metric system, the US Customary system is.
4 3 ReplyYour statement is incorrect
Since the Weights and Measures Act 1985, British law defines base imperial units in terms of their metric equivalent.
4 0 ReplySupplemental article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_yard_and_pound
2 0 Reply