Bulletins and News Discussion from May 20th to May 26th, 2024 - Never Break TrueAnon's Rules For Life - COTW: Azerbaijan
Bulletins and News Discussion from May 20th to May 26th, 2024 - Never Break TrueAnon's Rules For Life - COTW: Azerbaijan
Image is of Azerbaijan's President, Aliyev (left) and Armenia's President, Pashinyan (right) in a meeting a month or two after Azerbaijan took Nagorno-Karabakh.
- Never go to a second location.
- Always get the interior ministry post.
- Never get in a helicopter or any small aircraft.
- If someone with a gun enters your car, they’re gonna kill you.
- If someone tells you they’re not going to kill you, they’re calming you down to kill you later.
- Never give up your nukes.
- Never release the opposition's political prisoners.
- Never let the opposition delay elections.
- If someone starts to get into German runes, drop them.
- Never trust a South American with a German name.
- Never move anywhere for a religion.
- Never go into the sewers unless you’re a sewer guy.
- If someone’s trying to get you to commit a crime, they're FBI (sometimes CIA or military intelligence).
- Never become an FBI informant.
- If you do become an FBI informant, record everything.
- Never relinquish your arms.
- Always get it in writing.
- If you keep gambling, you’ll eventually win.
- Never talk to cops without a lawyer.
- Always pay your mercenaries.
- Don’t let anyone take your passport.
To add an addendum to rule 3, never put your President and Foreign Minister in the same helicopter or small aircraft. Especially if doing so in bad weather conditions. Especially if you're already under threat from a hostile nuclear power in the region with a proclivity for terrorism (though this probably isn't Israel's doing, in this particular case).
Anyway, Azerbaijan. Not a great country, I think. Did some genocides. They're a petrostate that is hosting Cop29, which I suppose is a way for the bourgeoisie to implicitly convey their contempt for the green movement. They got weapons from Israel, too.
Just for the record, there's an Iranian province called East Azerbaijan, which is not the same as Azerbaijan.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Azerbaijan! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
You're viewing a single thread.
Serious question, but why aren't we doing the
for Ebrahim Raisi? Sure he was against the west and the Iranian revolution was preferable to the western puppet king. But he was deeply right wing and murdered communists during the Revolution.well, if I'm celebrating something alongside NATOids and Zionists then I've probably deeply fucked up somewhere in my belief system
but regardless I don't think it's really
or 
, he was a complicated figure. kinda like Putin I suppose. the struggle session on this website when he dies will be very interesting to watchPutin may be a reactionary shithead but in the end, he will have done more to help emancipate billions of people in the Global South from Western imperialism and denazified more Western neo-Nazis than all of the Western left combined over the past few decades.
well, if I'm celebrating something alongside NATOids and Zionists then I've probably deeply fucked up somewhere in my belief system
Are you being flippant? Why is resisting western hegemony the only moral/political axis we care about? I don’t know anything about Raisi’s domestic policy tbh so can’t comment. But I don’t think it’s right to only focus on amerikkka bad while ignoring material conditions of those suffering under fascists globally.
you can say "amerikka bad" but really what it means is "western imperialism is the greatest obstacle to the left, even within 3rd world countries governed by the right-wing"
ironically, imperialists, intentionally and unintentionally, are more responsible for conservatism in iran than iran's own leaders. it's bizarre, but that's what a global system like capitalism manages to do
Ok, I take the point that imperialism is responsible for conservatism there, but I don’t really think that means we should skate over the abuses perpetrated by the conservatives themselves. I am happy our enemies are at each other’s throats
imperialism is responsible for conservatism there
hey i only said more responsible, iranian conservatives still had their own historical agency and are definitely our enemies. i mean, they're the ones who pulled the trigger, even if imperialism put the guns in their hands
iranian conservatives still had their own historical agency and are definitely our enemies
they are not our enemies. They are one of our strongest allies on Earth in defeating Zionism
Iran is not our enemy. If you think it is, you have remnants of chauvinism still
Figure out the principal contradiction of Iran (and the Middle East at large) first and you shall come to a clearer understanding about what your position should be.
It’s the same reason that many on the left support Palestinian resistance even though they may not have the most progressive views by our standards.
I will learn more about the principal contradiction and come back to this. Appreciate the feedback from everyone, here to learn
US-focused, but that may help in getting the point across https://hoodcommunist.org/2021/12/16/imperialism-unpacking-the-primary-contradiction/
Thanks!
Despite not knowing anything, you’re still commenting and comparing him to a fascist. And it’s called the primary contradiction for a reason.
Edit: this is the argument so-called “communists” use to both-sides colonialism in Palestine “why aren’t you liberating them from their theocratic fascist rulers”
I was going off what the OP said about him being rabidly right wing and murdering communists, which I don’t think anyone has challenged. I will educate myself on this topic more though
Why is resisting western hegemony the only moral/political axis we care about?
Because we live in the West and imperialism is the primary contradiction. It is your duty to be a revolutionary defeatist and oppose your nations imperialism, and if you aren't then you are a failure of a communist
I oppose western Imperialism to the core. My question was mainly about why we only focus on one axis of struggle when I feel we should also act with solidarity for the oppressed of other countries.
I am perfectly happy to be self critical and learn from all of your comments but I don’t think “you’d be a failure of a communist if X” is that helpful of a way of communicating tbh
I'm quoting Lenin almost verbatim.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/dec/25.htm
- A policy designed not to mislead the workers, but to open their eyes to reality, should consist in the following:
(a) Socialists in every country must now, when the question of peace is so directly posed, unfailingly and more vigorously than usual expose their own government and their own bourgeoisie. They must expose the secret agreements they have concluded, and are concluding, with their imperialist allies for the division of colonies, spheres of influence, joint financial undertakings in other countries, buying up of shares, monopoly arrangements, concessions, etc.
For in this, and in this alone, lies the real, not deceptive, basis and substance of the imperialist peace now being prepared. Everything else is meant to deceive the people. Those who vow and swear by these catchwords are not really supporting a democratic peace without annexations, etc., for real support means exposing, in practice, one’s own bourgeoisie, which by its actions is destroying these great principles of true socialism and true democracy.
For every member of parliament, every editor, every secretary of a labour union, every journalist and public leader can always gather the information kept secret by the government and the financiers that reveals the truth about the real basis of imperialist deals. A socialist’s failure to fulfill this duty is a betrayal of socialism. There need be no doubt that no government will allow, especially now, free publication of exposures of its real policy, its treaties, financial deals, etc. That is no reason to renounce such exposures. Rather it is a reason to renounce servile submission to the censorship and publish the facts freely, i.e., uncensored, illegally.
For the Socialist of another country cannot expose the government and bourgeoisie of a country at war with “his own” nation, and not only because he does not know that country’s language, history, specific features, etc., but also because such exposure is part of imperialist intrigue, and not an internationalist duty.
He is not an internationalist who vows and swears by internationalism. Only he is an internationalist who in a really internationalist way combats his own bourgeoisie, his own social-chauvinists, his own Kautskyites.
(b) In every country the Socialist must above all emphasise in all his propaganda the need to distrust not only every political phrase of his own government, but also every political phrase of his own social-chauvinists, who in reality serve that government.
(c) In every country the Socialists must above all explain to the masses the indisputable truth that a genuinely enduring and genuinely democratic peace (without annexations, etc.) can now be achieved only if it is concluded not by the present bourgeois governments, or by bourgeois governments in general, but by proletarian governments that have overthrown the rule of the bourgeoisie and are proceeding to expropriate it.
Revolutionary Defeatism, the DUTY of all socialists, requires first and foremost opposing one's imperialist government. One cannot expose an 'enemy' government that one's nation is at war with, it only serves imperialist intrigue and most westerners do not understand the specifics of other nations anyway. They MUST focus on their own imperialist first and foremost and oppose any fake internationalism that targets only enemies, as that's imperialist intrigue
But he was deeply right wing
Define “deeply right wing”.
Did you know Iran has a public holiday celebrating the nationalization of their oil industry from UK/US imperialists?
Do you know that the Iranian constitution protects the welfare of it’s citizens and guarantees free healthcare and education?
and murdered communists during the Revolution.
Because communists can never make any major mistakes, could never host opportunists and collaborators, could never become divorced from the masses, especially in the Islamic world.
I implore people who perpetuate the perception that Iran as “deeply right wing” take this logic to it’s final conclusions - by that standard, which Islamic country is not “deeply right wing”?
May aswell sentence every Islamic country as backward rightwing shitholes. Since apparently the Iranian Revolution - one of the most progressive Islamic mass movements in modern history - is right wing.
We muslims, instead, need to listen to the Communists who could not even organise the members of their own book club, let alone the masses!
No dialectics, just aesthetics - with an inbuilt victim complex to boot.
(Note I realise after typing this comment it seems I am being very antagonistic to the OP in particular, but I am not. It’s just a trend and sentiment I noticed that permeates a lot of discourse surrounding Iran and communism in the Islamic world more generally that I feel like needs to be addressed. I hold no ill-will to OP or anyone in particular that has fallen into Western propaganda.)
I completely agree, though I don't know if I would say the Iranian Communists from the revolution couldn't organize a book club. They fought like hell in overthrowing the Shah. It is crazy to dismiss progressive national movements for being anti-communist, but I am not sure I would be as harsh towards the Tudeh party and their martyrs. Other leftists didn't give support, but Tudeh did and their suppression in the early 80s is not their fault. The British even assisted the government in suppressing and torturing the arrested party members.
It is not as clear cut as op wants to think, but it is also not as clear cut the other way. Lot like Nasser in that regard. And to be clear op is wrong and we shouldn't be celebrating Raisi dying. This benefits no one but the enemies of the Palestine and the global south
Other leftists didn't give support, but Tudeh did and their suppression in the early 80s is not their fault
There are conflicting viewpoints on this from what I have read. I am not an expert in Iranian affairs so I’ll leave it to the historians and the Iranian people to sort out the details.
And to be clear op is wrong and we shouldn't be celebrating Raisi dying. This benefits no one but the enemies of the Palestine and the global south
That’s the point I was trying to make. This obsession and fixation of other countries’ political histories without humility and understanding of the global dynamics at play.
I could write a long essay about the communist party in my own country whose first leader was a triple agent of both the japanese imperialists and british colonizers. This nuance, although accurate, is irrelevant when discussing 21st century politics. There’s a reason why I never mentioned it in my previous comments covering southeast asian history.
The Tudeh party had relevance, back in 70s and 80s but not now. It really is a joke to discuss it now, like Iran is singlehandedly upholding the global capitalist system, and also when many muslims in the Global South deeply respect Iran and their president.
From what I see, many of Iran’s ills are directly because of Western sanctions and interventions. Not to mention the very tangible, material gains that the Iranian revolution had facilitated up to the present day, internally, and externally through the Axis of Resistance.
Why discuss something in public that will just play into anti-communist, or in this case imperialist, propaganda? Why distract ourselves from the important issue of US imperialism? What did Iran do to capture the heart of so many “well-meaning” westerners that they froth at their mouth at a slight mention of Iran?
Why discuss something in public that will just play into anti-communist, or in this case imperialist, propaganda?
We should be discussing these things when brought up in good faith in an echo chamber, like hexbear. It will be unproductive to focus on in in more formal settings where organizing and policy comes into place. Much like Hamas, we should be discussing their merits and failures here because most people here aren't fast to jump on some CIA bandwagon, but in real life you'll be wasting your breath trying to "distance" yourself from Hamas because the government already considers you a terrorist for opening your mouth about Israel, so it's better to spend that energy elsewhere.
The reason I mention Tudeh is because those are the communists op was mentioning, not current communists in Iran. It is silly to bring it up in this context, but I don't see the reason in trashing the Tudeh of the 80s in order to tell someone off for being a chauvinist, or juxtapose sympathy with Tudeh with support for the US. They are wrong, and the suppression of the communists following the Revolution was bad. I think ops comment was silly and baiting, but I just generally don't like being flippant about dead communists or putting the onus on them being out of touch with the masses being why they got tortured and killed by reactionaries just because Iran is a positive force in the global south.
Yeah we shouldn't be bothering with this matter right now, but that's why I settle for call it bait or sticking to the context of today, not dismissing or trivializing the killing of committed communists within living memory. Also again they are in the wrong, but I wouldn't call this public. A naive comment like that is a symptom of imperialist propaganda for sure, but I just think the critique should be kept to why we shouldn't be celebrating, not anything that could be construed as defending or obfuscating the killing of communists. They are wrong to bring up the Communists killed after the revolution when Raisi is not even cold yet, but I personally would recommend not litigating the worth of said communists in response.
This is all meant for the sake of discussing how we approach naivety from fellow leftists, not meant as an insult or serious criticism in any way. I share your distain for the sentiment in question, I just want to make clear in good faith what I think was overly harsh.
Also what country's communist party are you talking about if you don't mind me asking? That sounds wild
I think we are mostly in agreement here. I don’t see the need to continue the conversation.
Also what country's communist party are you talking about if you don't mind me asking? That sounds wild
It’s the Communist Party of Malaya. Be warned though, the history of the party is incredibly sad from start to finish. Sad in a “it could be so much more” kind of way, that is.
I'm not super up to the minute on Iranian politics but this is not something to mindlessly celebrate because "dead billionaire lol" when Iran is in the midst of getting closer to Saudi Arabia and peeling them away from normalization with Israel in the process
This is a good post that adds context to the relationship between the left and the Iranian government. The only thing I would note is that we don't really know who this benefits right now, if anyone. Part of what makes assassinations complicated, especially of government figures, is that it can be hard to tell what will happen in the power vacuum created. Lots of assassinations backfire because the perpatrators either don't do enough work to figure out who is going to replace their target or they get it wrong. Political assassinations are almost more about knowing who is going to take control in the aftermath than actually pulling off the assassination. It's possible that someone even more hard-line than Raisi takes his place on a permanent basis.
Define “deeply right wing”.
Many of the statements and actions are pretty right wing. For example, holding a holocaust denial conference a while back. However, I'm not knowledgeable about Iranian government like you (I just take what the Iranian government says at face value and don't really look too deeply into it), so it could be a subsection of the country, I don't know. Or how they mandate hijabs - this could be because the country is religious, but the west claims that most Iranians are against a mandate. I will say that while browsing the English wikipedia page for Iran, I was very surprised to see photos of Iranian women in modern day Iran dressing in typical western clothing; the western media only ever shows women in full body garbs. I'd like to learn more about what the reality is
edit: i've looked up some traveler's guides to Iran who talk about the reality of women's fashion there, and it seems that generally speaking, women can wear basically whatever they want as long as they cover their hair with a hijab, and the extent of said covering is not as strict as other conservative muslim countries
Because there is no international left at the moment. It was destroyed between 1917-2001. There is only the imperial core and the frontier.
International communism is in its infancy as it was in Europe during the 1840s. It needs to be awoken by popular mass movements that are destined to fail. At this point the fracturing of the imperial core is the best we can hope for if we want leftists movements to have any chance.
International communism is in its infancy as it was in Europe during the 1840s.
i'd never thought of it that way, depressing as fuck but i guess it's true
Because context matters. Ebrahim Raisi was not assassinated by a bunch of communists who are about to install state socialism in Iran. He was likely assassinated by Israeli intelligence in an attempt to destabilise Iran.
Honestly I think he was assassinated by the fog unless someone else can come up with better proof. That's not to say that nothing happened, just that helicopters crash a lot.
Because now one of the big anti western nations is leaderless and vulnerable. Not very good when world war 3 could erupt at any moment.
I feel like you’ve got it backwards, sure he was a right winger but ultimately he was fighting against the Zionist entity and its allies when he ascended. I’m not going to give him the Kissinger treatment for that alone
If you feel the need to celebrate the same victories as Zionoist and Iranian Shah fans do......
Because we aren’t chauvinist shitheads
You are free to celebrate his death with the Zionist freaks, deranged shah-simps, NAFO losers, Destiny enjoyers, /r/neoliberal enthusiasts, MEK cultists, and Wahhabist fanatics.