The Danish government said Sunday it would explore legal means of stopping protests involving the burning of holy texts in certain circumstances, citing security concerns following backlash over such…
Even contemplating to adapt legal limitations on what is considered to be free speech in both Denmark and Sweden is contra productive. You can't let backward thinking extremists dictate the countries laws.
With that said, I don't support the burnings but will tolerate them.
At some point when this attracts the attention of both extremists and Islamic countries, the government has to make a decision about the practical effects this may have on their citizenry.
I don't blame them at all for feeling like maybe they should bow out of an ideological battle they really don't have as much of a stake in, nor do I expect the majority of Danes to fight it for me.
Firstly, that taught us a lesson, you can either have free speech or you can have commerce. Look at how Sweden has had to slack on their democratic values to join NATO.
Do Denmark have a lot of trade with muslim countries?
We export a lot of dairy products to Muslim countries. Butter especially as well as powdered milk are big.
Your link is about Rasmus Paludan but we (Sweden) have had several Quran burnings done by others, so has Denmark.
Yes, so have we, but Paludan is the one case where the Russians goofed their OPSEC and we can show their involvement. One swallow does not a summer make, but Paludan has been burning Qurans left and right, and we're to believe that the Russian intelligence services were only involved once?
And were the over two hundred citizens who died for that policy happy to do so? Again, it's about a tradeoff, and I'm not going to fault them for the one that keeps Danes alive.