Skip Navigation

Biden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'

www.nbcnews.com Biden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'

“We need to get a lot more care into Gaza,” Biden said after the protesters were escorted out

Biden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'
491

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
491 comments
  • these, “Got it. You just don’t x.” responses are tiresome

    • Are you okay?

      • another appeal to ridicule? can't you just accept that it takes two to tango, and you are actively making this place worse?

        • No seriously, are you okay? It does not, in fact, take two, lest you seek one person to run their mouths and the other to just take it. So unless you're suggesting we enable bullying without pushing the bully back or fallacies without objection, I'm not really sure what the point is that you're making.

          So kindly explain your thought-process when you respond with simply re-quoting what I said and nothing more; for overall I think my comments remained largely neutral, barring the low-hanging fruit you identified and which I even acknowledged.

          • , I’m not really sure what the point is that you’re making.

            i'm saying don't use dishonest rhetoric

            • I'm fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing.

              Did you do that?

              Did you tell them as well that, "it takes two to tango"?

              Curiously you did not.

              • Did you do that?

                Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”?

                Curiously you did not.

                i asked you to be the bigger person.

                • Double-standard.

                  Ask both. Go on... It "takes two to tango," after all.

                  • you'll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.

              • do you think they would be more willing than you to stop engaging dishonestly?

                • Who's engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.

                  • you admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.

          • kindly explain your thought-process when you respond with simply re-quoting what I said

            i was pointing out the hypocrisy

            • What's hypocritical about noting, "these, 'Got it. You just don’t x.' responses are tiresome"? Do you not recognize the obvious snarkiness and straw-man fallacy? Are you saying I'm not allowed to call this out?

              And why are you replying multiple times to the same comment instead of just consolidating your response into one?

              • What’s hypocritical about noting, “these, ‘Got it. You just don’t x.’ responses are tiresome”? Do you not recognize the obvious snarkiness and straw-man fallacy? Are you saying I’m not allowed to call this out?

                i'm saying you are doing teh same thing, and you're right that they are exhausting, so you should also knock it off.

              • why are you replying multiple times to the same comment instead of just consolidating your response into one?

                i don't like to have multiple ideas in one comment, and i have found it's an excellent tactic for breaking up a gish gallop. you can read more here:

                https://lemmy.world/post/10922324

                • Hmm, that's really strange. I'll just report you for spam then. Thanks.

                  • in the months that have followed, this has neverbeen an issue for me.

You've viewed 491 comments.