Linux @lemmy.ml Guenther_Amanita @feddit.de 9 mo. ago

I'm working on a distro recommendation flowchart/ list for newcomers and need your input please! (Post is not only this picture btw and is mainly text)

We often get the same question with

"I'm new, what distro do you recommend?"

and I think we should make a list/ discussion on what is our pick for each person, and just link that post for them to give them an easy recommendation.

So I made a quick flow chart (will get polished as soon as I get your input) with my personal recommendations. It is on the bottom of the text, so you see the rest of the text here too.

I will also explain each distro in a few, short sentences and in what aspects they do differ and what makes them great.

Here are my "controversial" things I want to discuss with you first, as I don't want to spread nonsense:

Nobara

I don't know if we should recommend it as a good gaming distro. In my opinion, it's a highly insecure and experimental distro, made by one individual. I mean, sure, it gives you a slightly better experience ootb compared to vanilla Fedora, but:

As said, it's made by one single guy. If he decides to quit this project, many many people will just stop getting updates.
There are many security-things, especially SELinux, disabled.
It's severely outdated. Some security fixes take months until they arrive on Nobara.
It contains too many tweaks, especially kernel modifications and performance enhancers. Therefore, it might be less reliable.

I think, Bazzite is the way superior choice. It follows the same concept, but implements it in way better fashion:

Just as up-to-date as the normal Fedora, due to automatic GitHub build actions.
No burden of maintenence, either on the user or the dev side.
Fully intact security measures.
And much more.

Immutable distros

I'm a huge fan of them and think, that they are a perfect option for newcomers. They can't brick them, they update themselfes in the background, they take a lot of complexity compared to a traditional system, and much more. Especially uBlue and VanillaOS are already set up for you and "just work".
If you want to know more about image-based distros, I made a post about them btw :)

VanillaOS

It's the perfect counterpart for Mint imo. It follows the same principle (reliable, sane, easy to use, very noob friendly, etc.), but in a different way of achiving that.

The main problems are:

The team behind it isn't huge or well established yet, except for the development of Bottles.
They want to do many things their own way (own package manager, etc.) instead of just using established stuff.
The current release (V2, Orchid) is still in beta atm.

I see a huge potential in that particular distro, but don't know if I should recommend it at this point right now.

ZorinOS

I think, for people who don't like change, it's great, but it can be very outdated. What's your opinion on that distro? It looks very modern on the surface and is very noob friendly, but under the hood, very very old.

Pop!_OS

Same with that. Currently, there's only the LTS available, since System76 is currently very busy with their new DE. I don't know if we should recommend it anymore.

I made the list of recommendations relatively small on purpose, as it can be a bit overwhelming for noobs when they get a million recommendations with obscure distros.
Do you think that there are any distros missing or a bad recommendation?

116

You're viewing a single thread.

116 comments

You forgot "I want those cool socks" for arch Linux :P.

I think it's also worth noting that not everyone's coming to Linux for an easy time. Or essentially sometimes people are looking for the full experience like I did when I was younger. So it might be worth including path ways for those who want to compile everything themselves or even run so minimalist they essentially just using a terminal.
- I quite like your idea, but I'm very afraid that if I also include Nix, Arch, Gentoo, etc., we increase the chance that some "I just want to play some games and do my school stuff"-person decides to go the route of frustration and pain.
  
  I think we should mainly focus on "just works" and beginner friendly choices to give a good first impression, and if that's too lame for them, they can always go the other route.
  But those cases are relatively rare I think?
  
  I don't want to make the list of choices too big, as that could be overwhelming.
  
  What do you think of including them completely separate and as honorable mentions with a big disclaimer?
  
  It's up to you, I haven't touched the Linux community for a long time (only came back last week to fedora) so it may just be that I'm out of touch.
  
  When I was younger though, the biggest reason to change was because I wanted something different. If I was purely looking for playing games and homework I'd stay with Windows because it does work great for that and there would be no point to change.
  
  So the question is, what is it that grabs me onto Linux, and part of that is implied in your your graph, but part could be seen as these aspects.
  
  In saying that, I do get your point too, and for beginners it may be the better recommendation. In fact I may just be the outliner now that I think about it lol and maybe people don't try to set up Gentoo "just coz the community said it's hard and I took that personally" lol so an honorable mention may be better.
  
  if I also include Nix, Arch, Gentoo, etc.,
  
  You can add other distros and remove Fedora. I don't really understand why you would recommend it to a beginner anyway (too unstable).

You've viewed 116 comments.