Reddits favorite historian thinks both sides are to blame
Reddits favorite historian thinks both sides are to blame
Who would have thought the guy who took a year to gush over the Japanese Imperial army, was a chud?
Its history.
It's hardcore.
It's really mean of the Palestinians to fight back.
What the Japanese did when they suicide bombed American naval carriers was an act of immense bravery, fueled by dire circumstances that pushed the warriors to make the greatest of sacrifices. Palestinians fighting back is different, because I don't think they're cool or based.
Edit: Should probably make it clear I in no way think the Palestinians fighting against Israel is comparable to what the japanese did in WWII. I just think it's kinda telling that a guy who has spent 20+ hours glamorizing the japanese for fighting a "lost cause", somehow thinks it's wrong for the palestinians to fight a fight he thinks they have no chance of winning.
You're viewing a single thread.
I've never heard of this guy before, but he glamorized Japanese kamikaze pilots?
Sounds like a fascist to me.
He has a podcast called Hardcore History that, while the storytelling can be compelling, is based mostly on his "just asking questions" approach to history, almost like a weird parallel evolutionary branch of Joe Rogan thinking. He's not an historian, he just likes books about WWII and ancient Rome. His most recent series was about Imperial Japan and there were a lot of admiring words for both sides in the Pacific theater.
I liked his WW1 series, but everything after that has made me start to question the legitimacy of that series.
He's not the actual worst, but he's the perfect example of skeptically approaching politics without a material lens. He's got the right idea but the exact wrong approach that leads to wildly incoherent conclusions that, since they're not the accepted mainstream dogma, must be correct.
I just thought it was near how he focused on the horror of warfare in WW1. Something that was usually overshadowed in American highschool education because WW2 was the big topic.
He simultaneously flip-flopped between "was is hell and terrible" to "hey isn't this weapon system cool?"
He had probably just read The Face of Battle by John Keegan and riffed from there.
I think he did mention that at some point, but I listened to it like 7 years ago and don't feel like relistening to a 17 hour podcast
He’s not the actual worst
He’s pretty close to the bottom of the barrel though, he had Elon Musk on his other podcast which is devoted entirely to liberal civility politics. Same show went on hiatus when trump was elected because he got too weepy about “how divided our country is now” to continue
The barrel goes way deeper than that my friend
Oh for sure, he’s just got my personal loathing among podcasters I’ve listened to lol
Yeah that's exactly where he's at. The greatest possible amount of annoying from a podcaster that I'll ever listen to.
