The presenter has denied all allegations which have appeared in an investigation by The Sunday Times
Comedian Russell Brand has been accused of rape, sexual assaults and emotionally abusing four women during the height of his fame.
The alleged assaults occurred between 2006 and 2013, while he was a presenter for BBC Radio 2 and Channel 4, and include an assault on a 16-year-old girl.
He vehemently denied the “very serious criminal allegations” ahead of a Sunday Times article and an expected expose to be aired by Channel 4’s Dispatches programme tonight.
The allegations include crew members on his Big Brother spin-off being made to feel they were working as a “pimp” by approaching young women on his behalf, and that he raped a woman at his Los Angeles home.
I don't know the guy off screen, but it has always seemed that he was clever enough not to do something stupid and also that he had enough consensual sex to not have to pursue non consensual sex.
The guy is also rich enough to pay for whatever kind of legal prostitution he'd want, so it seems rather stupid of him if the allegations are true.
However, he's a known public pervert, so he's an easy target, if the allegations are false.
Occam's razor says that he's innocent - at least until proven guilty.
he had enough consensual sex to not have to pursue non consensual sex.
Rape is not about lacking opportunity for consensual sex, it is about getting off on power. And getting away with it because people insist on making excuses like this for the powerful.
For anyone doubting this (the fact that rape is about power and NOT sexual desire), check out the books The Evil that Men Do and Dark Dreams by Roy Hazelwood. He was one of the first guys on the FBI's behavioral analysis unit, who specifically studied sexual crimes like rape and assault.
Read at your own risk, it's full of really dark stories. The information is really insightful though.
Man, the mods here really need to start doing something about the rampant rape apologia on the sub. Why even have mods if they won't ban shit like this?
The community, through downvotes, make it clear that this is not an acceptable opinion to have.
If I remove the post, unless people dig through the mod log, all that is left is a blank space.
I'm happy to listen to reasoning for a different path.
But I'm of the opinion that I'd rather let the community see the bad takes, and have the opportunity to show their distaste through downvotes. (This does have limits, understandably)
And then it says "No one cares about downvotes" or "downvotes don't matter" when you argue they actually do matter or that they need to be changed in some way.
Stop trying to push off your responsibilities onto others and do your damn job. You see rape apologia, you delete rape apologia. That's your job as a mod. If you can't be assed, find someone else to be a mod.
But don't come to me with a bunch of excuses to not do what you're supposed to be doing. Grow the fuck up and do it.
Anyone against the establishment will get these accusations and a big fuss will be made about it... remember Kavanaugh? There's many like him. But then when Biden sniffs teenagers and all kinds of allegations of corruption are exposed in a laptop with a district attorney in Ukraine, they call it a hack, sweep it under the rug, and vote him president.
It's partisanship nonsense. I feel bad for people who don't see it.