You're viewing a single thread.
It's always bugged me that people who say that don't actually know the definition of natural.
(And for those of you who don't, it's "existent in nature", which homosexuality definitely is.)
Yep, like arsenic is natural, doesn't mean it's good for us.
Nobody was arguing that arsenic was unnatural though
Put the goal post back where it was
Moot point lmao classic religious take “let me just muddy your waters real quick call it magic, convince everyone I’m an ethereal, supernatural being and preach about general purpose rules and morals which would prevent the planet from destroying itself.
Good luck out there man, you’re gonna need it in the coming age of science. Like it or not, real “God” is self-evident and proveable - Her name is Science
Uhhh, I think you replied to the wrong comment, or severely misunderstood my comment. I'm an agnostic atheist and I was making fun of the religious argument that "unnatural=bad and natural=good". How is it a moot point that natural does not necessarily mean good for you? Good luck out there man, you're gonna need it since you are making massive leaps based on something that exists only in your head. Take a chill pill, you clearly need it.
Oh, and science is not my God cause I don't worship it.
I worship the fuck out of science, I do rituals, read their holy doctrines, listen to their holy people, etc. science is through and through the best religion because it’s provable and infallible.
Back to your original comment however, it was directed towards you because the original persons comment said that being gay was definitely natural and you responded with “cYaNiDe iS nAtUrAl” so I assumed you weren’t agreeing but where instead, logically, a bigoted Christian who could stand to be shit on. Ironically I was laughing when I originally responded so it looks like we both made some leaps and asses of ourselves today :)
I should’ve asked for clarification instead of assuming, my bad