No, you've obnoxiously demanded that I reply on your timetable. I'm not going to reward that behavior. Believe what you want about me, I'm done with this conversation.
actually meant "I know where the data is and was going to provide it shortly, but now I'm offended so I won't"?
Though we can just look at your comment history and see you almost never write more than a sentence or two. So I guess I don't know why I'm even trying with you since it won't matter.
btw, I did look up the 2020 primary campaign too. Tons of oil industry money, he even had the Koch brothers donating to him. Not big DNC spending though.
actually meant “I know where the data is and was going to provide it shortly, but now I’m offended so I won’t”?
It meant "you were worth the effort but I was going to fuck with it when I had more free time. Now that you've decided to be an entitled sealioning Karen about the whole thing, I'm not going to participate on your terms."
Yea sure, you were planning on coming back to it after just casually downvoting some numbers from a reputable source just because they don't support your theories. Very convenient. Not very common at all though. Perhaps you're a very rare internet commenter? Also amusing that you had plenty of time to banter back and forth with me, but some data to back your claim must apparently be very involved to find. Strange, mine only took a few minutes to find.
Yea sure, you were planning on coming back to it after just casually downvoting some numbers from a reputable source just because they don’t support your theories.
You demanded a full thought out response after an hour. You don't get to order me to dance for you on your timetable. You're not getting shit from me now. No matter how obnoxiously you goad, harrass and sealion, I'm not answering any of your questions. You are not owed participation on your terms.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure you're just pulling my leg to make it look like you're some serious guy who doesn't actually just pick things to believe based on how convenient they are.
Just like how you tossed out that Texas Representatives name as an example of heavy DNC spending in a house race, even though the DNC in no way spent heavily on that race. Not sure how you could've "fucked with" that, but whatever. Also amusing how you were "done with this conversation" like 3 comments ago. Did I prick your pride? Sorry about that. Misinformation pisses me off though.