I already said my patience was wearing out and you insist on using direct language to imply I'm about to discover some horrible secret as if I don't know. You insisted on repeating that I will find out how fast rights can be lost while leaving yourself out of the concept each time. No inclusive language just directed at me each time.
It is not always on others to take things better when you are at the base of the negativity.
Your grants mean nothing and your inability to understand the emotional truth of others is the point that I believe you don't get.
Please consider how you are an important actor in this conversation and have been since the beginning when you were told are wrong. You "agreeing" and then going against your own logic to hold onto your own ideas is your own issue.
If everyone else keeps telling you something about you not getting it, maybe stop blaming others.
If you want to see where the disconnect is happening look at your own responses where you say "I disagree" because you want to.
Maybe don't treat others like emotionless chat bots for your own self reassurance and work on comprehension yourself.
Lots of feelings there. Sorry pal. I hope you find a better place to be. We're talking past each other. Just because someone says they disagree on a topic doesn't mean it's a personal attack on you. You have to find a way to make discourse with those of different opinions without making everything so personal.
You're writing walls of text with very supercharged language. Something about this conversation is very triggering for you. You've also made it a point to downvote every one of my comments. Cool.
Could you summarize my position in one sentence so you can demonstrate you understand what I'm saying?
No just the comments where you stopped participating in an active conversation.
That's the point of the downvote. Doesn't add to the conversation and down vote it.
You totally agree with Harris being a bad choice but think it's everyone that pointed out that she was a bad choice for making it seem like she was a bad choice for losing. That "nitpicking" policy is not the same as just pointing out the bad policy that won't be popular among others that don't say anything and somehow lockstep Republicans are better because you think they don't have disagreement and we need to copy that idea of lockstep authoritarianism of silencing dissenters to make the DNC win first so that they then can still have bad policy that no one criticizes that you think will then be adjustable.
Your position subtly changes to whatever you think is right at the moment. I think you truly are a self indulgent individual who thinks themself infallible while not thinking critically but demanding it of others.
The text is charged because you continue to ignore your own input into creating this conversation and how your own statements have been condescending. You literally ended each comment saying how "I" would soon learn how fast rights could be taken away. A statement I have repeatedly pointed out that you somehow continue to ignore to ask why you are being taken poorly.
You started with just saying you didn't agree cause you didn't want to. And have put all effort in this on me and can't understand why this makes for bad conversation? Do you ever actually talk to people or talk past them cause you think you are above them? Cause you put all the conversation on me dispel while repeating yourself ad nauseam.
Jeesus christ. Your walls of text and runon sentences make it very hard to follow what you are writing.
You totally agree with Harris being a bad choice but think it's everyone that pointed out that she was a bad choice for making it seem like she was a bad choice for losing.
Close but no. There is no discourse happening here and a lot of projection going on from your part. It's very hard to have a convo when one side makes one point and the other writes a wall of text essay while also calling the other names and insults non stop. I hope you find peace and hapiness wherever you are.
They aren't runon sentences they have plenty of punctuation that helps them flow, but we are past having a conversation though I don't believe we really had one at all.
And it's what your position is and appears to be from the outside because you refuse to stand behind your point and back it up further than that. You don't make points you make statements you want to be true.
I hope you grow and do more than think pushing against others to fix everyone else's mindset will do anything for the world.
I hope you grow and learn to have conversations with people of different points of view without getting all buthurt in the anus every time someone disagrees with you.
You know what. Mostly I hope you learn to stop feeling like by having the last word you show that you are somehow superior and more cultured than others in your unending need to feel right. And that you learn to back of the stubbornness and end a conversation without it always being on your terms cause no one owes you anything.
Least of all letting you have the last word because you want it.
What a bizarre thing to zero in on. Is this what keeps you up at night? Who has the last word? Who the fuck cares... It's just a message board. Here: if it makes you feel good you can get the last word in and I won't respond. Pinky promise. Have at it.
Also not bizarre it's why you keep responding and why you even aim for a win condition by gracing it away.
You have learned nothing and yet continue to be self assured. It has been my point Since you said "no, I don't think so" and refused to back a legitimate point so you could be right.
But thank you for not responding. I hope you never do so again.