South Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocence
South Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocence
Khalil Divine Black Sun Allah, 46, killed by lethal injection days after state’s key witness recanted critical testimony
You're viewing a single thread.
Execution shouldn't be an option. At least with life in prison you can release a person if you fucked up, with significant financial compensation for their time in prison. You can't un-execute a person. The state isn't competent enough to be given such power. Nobody is.
The purpose of the US legal system is not to provide justice. It's to terrorise poor people and minorities. So, it worked just fine here.
The "nobody is" is the most important part to me.
Like, society can argue all they want about choosing to execute convicted criminals of certain crimes. I'm not discussing that.
It's the "beyond all doubt" factor that matters most. I think we'd agree that for ~99.99999% of crimes it's really impossible to be sure.
If you can't be sure, then there's no reason to graduate to the next step of the decision "should we".
Giving the state the power to take life from its citizens is open to abuse when the wrong person gets into power. Not allowing it in the first place is how you go towards stopping that sort of thing.
We don't seem to have a problem giving the state power to take life from other countries' citizens, though. The only way you can stop that is if the other country is more powerful than yours.
But what is the cost of compensation for executing somebody that was likely innocent?
—Think about this. Life in prison is cheaper than an execution If the convict serves their entire sentence. –Is it still cheaper if the inmate has their conviction overturned and subsequently sues for restitution?
I genuinely don't know the answer to the latter question but nothing about sanctioned executions sits right with me.