Trump re-charged in special counsel election case due to Supreme Court immunity ruling
Trump re-charged in special counsel election case due to Supreme Court immunity ruling
Donald Trump is still charged with four counts related to his alleged efforts to illegally overturn his loss to President Joe Biden in the 2020 election.
You're viewing a single thread.
But Smith’s case was put on hold for months while Trump’s lawyers litigated their argument that he was immune from the charges because he was president at the time the alleged acts took place.
The Supreme Court took up the dispute. In a July 1 ruling vehemently opposed by its three liberal justices, the court held that former presidents enjoy “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for certain executive conduct and “presumptive immunity” for all other official acts.
I still can't get over the Supreme Court declaring that the U.S. effectively has a king.
While simultaneously defining themselves as the arbiters of that kingship, no less.
Shocked that there isn't a smoking crater where each of their houses used to be.
Imagine if the US was the only country with a constitution with a clause specifically for this kind of situation
We should see if the Ukrainians have a spare handful of those new cruise missile drones available to visit the residences of the Tribunal of Six.
For real though, if those fucksticks actually try to ignore electoral results and hand the election to Trump, I genuinely do not see the situation getting resolved without a very significant level of political violence - perhaps even ultimately devolving into open civil war. Seriously, look at what Ken Paxton is doing in Texas only days ago. That is some authoritarian police state shit.
All rights are won through violence.
Except for the many times they weren't
name one.
Easy. Women got the right to vote in America from non violent protests.
However violence was inacted against them. They won those rights as a reaction to the brutilization they suffered in their fight.
So the argument is that violence is good... because the bad guys once used it and lost because they did... ? wtffff
No. The argument is that all rights are won through violence. The violence may just be against the people wanting rights
The violence may just be against the people wanting rights
... so it's still good violence, then?
So you're saying america wasnt founded on violence?
BTW, you're also wrong -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffragette_bombing_and_arson_campaign
https://www.history.com/news/night-terror-brutality-suffragists-19th-amendment
ALL RIGHTS ARE WON THROUGH VIOLENCE
This makes you sound bloodthirsty. Good luck with that.
Just hungry for the flesh of some politicians and billionaires, with a stretch goal of having a livable environment to retire in someday...
Cannibalism isn't cool. Neither is murder.
So you're saying america wasnt founded on violence?
Uh no and you know I said nothing like that and it has nothing to do with my point in the slightest.
Also your links do not prove that the violence was necessary. It was not.
Every horrible violent piece of human filth has believed what you're selling here. I find it horribly disgusting how many people think that violence is an answer. Keep your sewer thoughts to yourself.
Biden should really be taking advantage of that ruling and doing whatever the fuck he wants