Some apps don’t respect GNOME’s large text setting (Alacritty)
125% scale
Most apps look blurry (Picard, Firefox, Spotify, Alacritty)
200% scale
Everything is way too big
Unusable
Plasma
100% scale
Nothing looks blurry
Everything is tiny
Unusable
125% scale + Apply scaling themselves
Nothing looks blurry
Most apps scale appropriate
Some apps can’t scale themselves and look tiny (Picard)
125% scale + Scaled by system
Most apps look blurry (Picard, Firefox, Spotify, Alacritty)
200% scale
Everything is way too big
Unusable
New display, 2880 x 1920 (3:2)
GNOME
100% scale
Nothing looks blurry
Everything is tiny
Unusable
100% scale + large text accessibility
Nothing looks blurry
Most apps scale appropriately
Some apps don’t respect GNOME’s large text setting (Alacritty)
Everything is tiny
150% scale
Most apps look blurry (Picard, Firefox, Spotify, Alacritty)
200% scale
Everything is way too big
Unusable
Plasma
100% scale
Nothing looks blurry
Everything is tiny
Unusable
150% scale + Apply scaling themselves
Nothing looks blurry
Some apps can’t scale themselves, but look a little better here? (Picard)
150% scale + Scaled by system
Most apps look blurry (Picard, Firefox, Spotify, Alacritty)
200% scale
Everything is way too big
Unusable
tl;dr
In the old display, GNOME at 100% + large text was the best compromise.
In the new display, Plasma at 150% + Apply scaling themselves is the best compromise.
Interestingly, Picard scaling itself looks super tiny in the old display, but in the new display it looks... better. It's still not correctly scaled like native Wayland apps, but it's better.
Warning
If you can't stomach moving from GNOME to Plasma, then 🚨 DO NOT BUY THE NEW DISPLAY 🚨. The new display is worse for GNOME.
Once again
I am once again begging Framework to just give us a damn regular DPI display that works! Without workarounds. Without forcing users on specific DEs. Without forcing users to stop using their favorite apps. This new display has basically all of the flaws as the previous one.
No, the problem is, built-in displays have too high resolution for their usecase (because vendors can demand more cash for it). Things don't get less sharp if you scale that (via resolution) to comfortale size, your angular resolution doesn't get better just with that. You don't lose pixels you can't see.
The hack is the solution that sometimes works and sometimes not, which is the case with software scaling.
And your "future" is at least five years ago.
edit: "too low set resolution", what are you talking about? It's too high originally, heating your notebook and lowering battery live for nothing.
Setting scale down makes everything looks shit! Are you blind?! The pixels are fucking gigantic if you do this. I go through up if I have to use lowDPI screens, evry usecase demands at least 2k or better 3kfor me (at 14”). Speaking desktop 32” 4k it is.
Usecase matters for pixel density. You have the phone close to your face, 400 dpi are just enough here. Notebook, more far away, is about 300 dpi ideal. Desktop, about 200 dpi. This is why a TV, usually 3m+ away, has about 65" in 4k. But if you sit 1m before your TV, you see big pixels.
Now, for notebook, usual size of 13" to 17", resolution between 1280x and 2560x is good. You see no pixels, no battery draining and fan noise, and no issues with some tool not/weird scaling.
1280 is nearly "2k" being typically 1440, and yea that’s "good" but I still see some pixel framing, to be "great” it need to be at least more than 2500 for me