The Kamala Harris campaign is using memes and celebrities to present her as a fun-loving progressive candidate. In reality, she represented the ugly face of the US' brutal and corrupt justice system as prosecutor. As Vice President, she has been an apologist for genocide, war, and anti-migrant policies.
I couldn’t have possibly known that a list of articles from The Guardian, LA Times, The Nation, Rolling Stone, SF Gate, Huffington Post, Jacobin, The Intercept, The Atlantic, and more doesn’t meet your definition of journalism and is in some twisted way “opinion.”
Then proceeded to be all 'BuT I cOuLdN't TeLl'
A wise man can also use a fucking search engine in 2024, shitlib. If you wanna vote for 95% Hitler, by all means, but don't do this holier than thou shit for a candidate that's gonna continue a genocide.
I don't think you know the internet laws. That's ok. I think they're getting a little skewed.
So here's the rule: if a person makes a claim (meme or post) and are asked for a source, and they do not present said source, then their statement is either taken with a grain of salt or false. Questions? Comments? Concerns?
I don't think you do either. This isn't a debate forum. If you do not wish to educate yourself on something, it is your own failing, not my own for 'failing' to teach someone who's intentions and integrity I can never know. I am not obliged to waste my time sending links to someone who may never care. This is a niche leftist forum, there are no third parties who may view and learn from comment chains without prior knowledge or opinion, which is the usual argument for doing so.
If you want to better yourself, you're going to have a hard time moving forward when you insist that everyone else should humor you.
I don't think you know the law around here pardner. You're lookin at it, and one of our main rules is no concern trolling, debate pervertry or genocide apologia. I think you need to spend some time self reflecting on why you insist on this behavior.