You're viewing a single thread.
Is it really that bad if they mostly look like a person and are consenting?
I'd say you're mostly safe since we're not even reaching step two.
All of those look <18 so there might be another conversation to be had here. Especially 5, because foxes typically die of old age well before their 10th birthday. Yes, even magical foxes, science doesn’t discriminate against abominations unless it currently is.
Are you saying Japanese lore of 2000 year old fox ladies lied to me?
I’m sorry to say but, much like the class gerbil, they’re replaced in secret. There can be no foxy ladies, merely fox girls. Relatedly, have you ever wondered why He’s called The Lamb?
Well then lock me up because I want to Reeaaeeecbeereeeookaaaaabdhelooawooooooo those 🦊 👗 🐾 girls OwO.
yes CIA, this lemming right here
They're just going to use it as kompromat.
We are talking about sentient, possibly anthropomorphic foxes. Do you think science applies here, especially with regard to how old they typically get?
Nah she is actually type 2 except for the face
But without the face she isn't quite there yet.
Id say post strip scene puts her firmly at two. 1 mostly implies just the ears and tail being the change (the shit lemmy makes me say sometimes)
She can't be fully 2 without the paws and face though.
My understanding of two is its starting to pick up animal features while still looking mostly human, whereas one could affectively just be accessories added
Idgaf if they look 100% like an animal as long as they are and adult and able to communicate and consent you can fuck whatever you want as far as I am concerned.
