You're viewing part of a thread.
well it's a demonym, which does exist.
If you were talking about race, i would agree with you, because race literally does not exist.
1 1 Replyethnically I am a Pennsylvanian..wtf..
1 0 Replyethnically would be some flavor of european, slav, asian, or south african/american and to some degree, american (considering the natives as american)
like i said, that's a demonym.
1 0 Replyyou're wrong and condescending: not a good combination.
1 0 Replydoesn't take much googling to find out im not wrong. As for being condescending, i think i would just argue that i'm correct.
1 1 Replyit's my ethnicity. I would know
1 0 Replywell, i mean your genetics would know. I'm not sure you would, unless you can read your own DNA.
1 1 Replyethnicity isn't genetics
1 0 Replyand dogs aren't genetics, neither are nuclear reactors, or vacuums.
1 1 Replythis is a nonsequitur.
1 0 Replyyou made it first. You said that ethnicity isn't genetics. Which is true, because ethnicity != genetics. In order for your statement to be properly true it would have to something more like ethnic heritage = genetics, because heritage is genetics.
1 1 Reply